Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Feminists
In reply to the discussion: Sexist language that I personally cannot stand [View all]unblock
(55,061 posts)5. i don't like that english doesn't have a third party singular alive-but-unspecified-gender pronoun.
it has "they", which is third person unspecified gender PLURAL, but for third person singular, i'm stuck with he, she, or it.
i guess the idea is that if their gender is unknown or unspecified, they might as well be dead?
why is identifying someone's gender SO important that you can't even use pronouns until you determine the gender?
as in: "see that person over there in the distance? they're wearing a hat!"
that's the "best" we can do, make an obvious singular/plural error.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

If its asked by your boss, you may have an actionable legal complaint.
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2012
#41
i don't like that english doesn't have a third party singular alive-but-unspecified-gender pronoun.
unblock
Jun 2012
#5
I tend to use male/female because not all males are men and not all females are women.
laconicsax
Jun 2012
#30