Feminists
In reply to the discussion: My thoughts on Neoma's actions (as if they matter at all) [View all]Lisa D
(1,532 posts)Below is a post by iverglas to Neoma in the off-site host forum. The link to that forum was posted in H&M and is here for anyone who wants the full context of the conversation: http://feministshosts.boardhost.com
Whether you agree with Neoma's opinion or not in that thread, she was simply discussing and debating the possible blocking of a poster. It appeared to be a short, civil conversation. But because she disagreed with iverglas, she was told to consider resigning as a co-host of the group.
And not one other host stepped in and said something like: "This forum is for discussion and should be not be used to browbeat other hosts into agreement or threaten their position here. Let's have a vote and the majority will rule on this decision." Not one. So, while I don't support everything Neoma has done in this group, I can certainly see why she might not have trusted the other hosts after that incident.
***********************************************************
Neoma, I'm sorry again, but you are apparently not getting something.
"Hating men because they're men and so on."
Why do you think you can say things like that? Who at DU, let alone in the Feminists forum, has done that?
"People do concentrate on gender too much sometimes."
It is the FEMINISTS forum. It is about WOMEN. What the hell else is the group supposed to concentrate on?????
Neoma, either YOU agree with the SoP, and with making the Feminists group SAFE for discussions that fit within the SoP, or you should consider resigning as co-host.
Defending assholes like mistertrickster when they attack the group is not the job of a host.
**************************************************************