Feminists

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

55. ha ha. then you locked that forum. so? and she quit talking to all of us

Reply to iverglas (Reply #51)

Tue Feb 14, 2012, 09:16 AM

Feb 2012

and proceed to converse with those outside this forum.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neoma, you need to resign as host of this form, right now. [View all] boston bean Feb 2012 OP

I don't know what happened... but maybe this would be better discussed behind closed doors? n/t Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #1

it is being discussed in the Feminists forum iverglas Feb 2012 #3

It can't be at this point. boston bean Feb 2012 #4

yeah, ok. stepping into something i know nothing about. not the first time. do what you need to. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #6

and every single person who has said otherwise iverglas Feb 2012 #2

I agree with you about the transparency Lisa D Feb 2012 #10

I have no problem with hosts discussing things in private. boston bean Feb 2012 #13

what the fuck is the problem here? iverglas Feb 2012 #14

No, it's not improper Lisa D Feb 2012 #27

where was our full transperancy as hosts and regular members when our host, representing us seabeyond Feb 2012 #31

no, you didn't agree with me iverglas Feb 2012 #33

you can read my posts about why we should block a disruptor. but understand every group seabeyond Feb 2012 #21

It wasn't a Host Forum -- non hosts also posted there obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #30

what are you talking about? after she unilaterally kicked iverglas out as a host and forum member seabeyond Feb 2012 #34

Non-hosts posted there? Lisa D Feb 2012 #35

why don't you try asking first for proof of the truth of that allegation? iverglas Feb 2012 #40

That's why I asked the question Lisa D Feb 2012 #47

really? here's your question: iverglas Feb 2012 #53

I'll reword it Lisa D Feb 2012 #56

why? iverglas Feb 2012 #57

the host forum that was set up has a link that has made the rounds outside this forum. seabeyond Feb 2012 #58

Yes obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #49

who? i was there. i would like to know who the nonhost was. who? nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #50

it's a trick answer iverglas Feb 2012 #51

that isn't actually correct, of course iverglas Feb 2012 #52

ha ha. then you locked that forum. so? and she quit talking to all of us seabeyond Feb 2012 #55

put your money where your mouth is iverglas Feb 2012 #54

really? Non hosts also posted there? iverglas Feb 2012 #37

No obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #48

You just claimed in that OP you started in H&M that yr sincere in wanting to resolve issues... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #59

There has been no discussion at that site since Neoma's dirty trick iverglas Feb 2012 #43

How is this not calling out a DUer? HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #5

that's the only reason i responded in the first place. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #7

This is not calling out a DUer boston bean Feb 2012 #9

I think Meta would be a better place for it justiceischeap Feb 2012 #12

then alert, and we'll see what happens. boston bean Feb 2012 #15

I alerted immediately... when I saw a DU'er called out by name on the Latest threads board Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #19

have you gotten the results yet? boston bean Feb 2012 #20

yeah 3-3 Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #25

no worries, you did what you thought you needed to. boston bean Feb 2012 #38

thank you! i felt like i was under attack Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #42

I don't know of any reason why it would need to be alerted on justiceischeap Feb 2012 #22

The jury thinks this is a fine place for it . boston bean Feb 2012 #32

this is a group discussion about our group. when any group talks about their group seabeyond Feb 2012 #24

Yet justiceischeap Feb 2012 #44

no, you should not take it to Meta iverglas Feb 2012 #18

why are you here? iverglas Feb 2012 #8

I have NO dog in this fight, so I guess I'm sticking up for my fellow DU'er because I Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #17

you dont know what you are talking about but have already drawn conclusions seabeyond Feb 2012 #29

ok. i've already stated 3 or 4 times my reasons for alerting. it's been resolved by jury vote... Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #36

I'm here for the same reason I entered my kids bedroom when they were fighting HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #28

so what should we do? shut up? we have people from outside our group seabeyond Feb 2012 #39

READ THE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE iverglas Feb 2012 #41

FOR THE INFO OF ANYONE COMING HERE VIA A LINK ELSEWHERE ON D.U. iverglas Feb 2012 #11

Verdict on the OP jberryhill Feb 2012 #16

thank you for the info iverglas Feb 2012 #23

i did it Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #26

yes. you did. thank you. and i think you better understand it is not about hurting seabeyond Feb 2012 #45

ok. cool. I'm out for real this time. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #46

i certainly don't recall voting for Neoma for ANYTHING.... Scout Feb 2012 #60

She was suggested by seabeyond and apparently confirmed by the group justiceischeap Feb 2012 #61

I don't care what seabeyond said or did, she does not speak for me. boston bean Feb 2012 #62

sharing private messages is not appropriate. she needs to resign. Scout Feb 2012 #63

First off, Neoma is the host of the forum through an approved process. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #64

I agree with everything you said. Lisa D Feb 2012 #66

You are leaving out something very important Gormy Cuss boston bean Feb 2012 #67

Yet, there have also been Lisa D Feb 2012 #68

This place is toxic Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #65