Feminists

iverglas

(38,549 posts)

52. that isn't actually correct, of course

Tue Feb 14, 2012, 08:57 AM

Feb 2012

Neoma didn't pull her dirty trick until after the discussions were held at the hosts place.

So whoever is saying otherwise needs to offer their proof or withdraw their false claim.

Or own up to playing the game that my post welcoming visitors, posted after Neoma removed me as host, is what they're talking about. That would be a pretty silly game, but that must be it.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neoma, you need to resign as host of this form, right now. [View all] boston bean Feb 2012 OP

I don't know what happened... but maybe this would be better discussed behind closed doors? n/t Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #1

it is being discussed in the Feminists forum iverglas Feb 2012 #3

It can't be at this point. boston bean Feb 2012 #4

yeah, ok. stepping into something i know nothing about. not the first time. do what you need to. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #6

and every single person who has said otherwise iverglas Feb 2012 #2

I agree with you about the transparency Lisa D Feb 2012 #10

I have no problem with hosts discussing things in private. boston bean Feb 2012 #13

what the fuck is the problem here? iverglas Feb 2012 #14

No, it's not improper Lisa D Feb 2012 #27

where was our full transperancy as hosts and regular members when our host, representing us seabeyond Feb 2012 #31

no, you didn't agree with me iverglas Feb 2012 #33

you can read my posts about why we should block a disruptor. but understand every group seabeyond Feb 2012 #21

It wasn't a Host Forum -- non hosts also posted there obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #30

what are you talking about? after she unilaterally kicked iverglas out as a host and forum member seabeyond Feb 2012 #34

Non-hosts posted there? Lisa D Feb 2012 #35

why don't you try asking first for proof of the truth of that allegation? iverglas Feb 2012 #40

That's why I asked the question Lisa D Feb 2012 #47

really? here's your question: iverglas Feb 2012 #53

I'll reword it Lisa D Feb 2012 #56

why? iverglas Feb 2012 #57

the host forum that was set up has a link that has made the rounds outside this forum. seabeyond Feb 2012 #58

Yes obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #49

who? i was there. i would like to know who the nonhost was. who? nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #50

it's a trick answer iverglas Feb 2012 #51

that isn't actually correct, of course iverglas Feb 2012 #52

ha ha. then you locked that forum. so? and she quit talking to all of us seabeyond Feb 2012 #55

put your money where your mouth is iverglas Feb 2012 #54

really? Non hosts also posted there? iverglas Feb 2012 #37

No obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #48

You just claimed in that OP you started in H&M that yr sincere in wanting to resolve issues... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #59

There has been no discussion at that site since Neoma's dirty trick iverglas Feb 2012 #43

How is this not calling out a DUer? HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #5

that's the only reason i responded in the first place. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #7

This is not calling out a DUer boston bean Feb 2012 #9

I think Meta would be a better place for it justiceischeap Feb 2012 #12

then alert, and we'll see what happens. boston bean Feb 2012 #15

I alerted immediately... when I saw a DU'er called out by name on the Latest threads board Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #19

have you gotten the results yet? boston bean Feb 2012 #20

yeah 3-3 Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #25

no worries, you did what you thought you needed to. boston bean Feb 2012 #38

thank you! i felt like i was under attack Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #42

I don't know of any reason why it would need to be alerted on justiceischeap Feb 2012 #22

The jury thinks this is a fine place for it . boston bean Feb 2012 #32

this is a group discussion about our group. when any group talks about their group seabeyond Feb 2012 #24

Yet justiceischeap Feb 2012 #44

no, you should not take it to Meta iverglas Feb 2012 #18

why are you here? iverglas Feb 2012 #8

I have NO dog in this fight, so I guess I'm sticking up for my fellow DU'er because I Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #17

you dont know what you are talking about but have already drawn conclusions seabeyond Feb 2012 #29

ok. i've already stated 3 or 4 times my reasons for alerting. it's been resolved by jury vote... Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #36

I'm here for the same reason I entered my kids bedroom when they were fighting HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #28

so what should we do? shut up? we have people from outside our group seabeyond Feb 2012 #39

READ THE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE iverglas Feb 2012 #41

FOR THE INFO OF ANYONE COMING HERE VIA A LINK ELSEWHERE ON D.U. iverglas Feb 2012 #11

Verdict on the OP jberryhill Feb 2012 #16

thank you for the info iverglas Feb 2012 #23

i did it Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #26

yes. you did. thank you. and i think you better understand it is not about hurting seabeyond Feb 2012 #45

ok. cool. I'm out for real this time. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #46

i certainly don't recall voting for Neoma for ANYTHING.... Scout Feb 2012 #60

She was suggested by seabeyond and apparently confirmed by the group justiceischeap Feb 2012 #61

I don't care what seabeyond said or did, she does not speak for me. boston bean Feb 2012 #62

sharing private messages is not appropriate. she needs to resign. Scout Feb 2012 #63

First off, Neoma is the host of the forum through an approved process. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #64

I agree with everything you said. Lisa D Feb 2012 #66

You are leaving out something very important Gormy Cuss boston bean Feb 2012 #67

Yet, there have also been Lisa D Feb 2012 #68

This place is toxic Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #65