Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,529 posts)
20. have you gotten the results yet?
Tue Feb 14, 2012, 08:23 AM
Feb 2012

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't know what happened... but maybe this would be better discussed behind closed doors? n/t Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #1
it is being discussed in the Feminists forum iverglas Feb 2012 #3
It can't be at this point. boston bean Feb 2012 #4
yeah, ok. stepping into something i know nothing about. not the first time. do what you need to. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #6
and every single person who has said otherwise iverglas Feb 2012 #2
I agree with you about the transparency Lisa D Feb 2012 #10
I have no problem with hosts discussing things in private. boston bean Feb 2012 #13
what the fuck is the problem here? iverglas Feb 2012 #14
No, it's not improper Lisa D Feb 2012 #27
where was our full transperancy as hosts and regular members when our host, representing us seabeyond Feb 2012 #31
no, you didn't agree with me iverglas Feb 2012 #33
you can read my posts about why we should block a disruptor. but understand every group seabeyond Feb 2012 #21
It wasn't a Host Forum -- non hosts also posted there obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #30
what are you talking about? after she unilaterally kicked iverglas out as a host and forum member seabeyond Feb 2012 #34
Non-hosts posted there? Lisa D Feb 2012 #35
why don't you try asking first for proof of the truth of that allegation? iverglas Feb 2012 #40
That's why I asked the question Lisa D Feb 2012 #47
really? here's your question: iverglas Feb 2012 #53
I'll reword it Lisa D Feb 2012 #56
why? iverglas Feb 2012 #57
the host forum that was set up has a link that has made the rounds outside this forum. seabeyond Feb 2012 #58
Yes obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #49
who? i was there. i would like to know who the nonhost was. who? nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #50
it's a trick answer iverglas Feb 2012 #51
that isn't actually correct, of course iverglas Feb 2012 #52
ha ha. then you locked that forum. so? and she quit talking to all of us seabeyond Feb 2012 #55
put your money where your mouth is iverglas Feb 2012 #54
really? Non hosts also posted there? iverglas Feb 2012 #37
No obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #48
You just claimed in that OP you started in H&M that yr sincere in wanting to resolve issues... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #59
There has been no discussion at that site since Neoma's dirty trick iverglas Feb 2012 #43
How is this not calling out a DUer? HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #5
that's the only reason i responded in the first place. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #7
This is not calling out a DUer boston bean Feb 2012 #9
I think Meta would be a better place for it justiceischeap Feb 2012 #12
then alert, and we'll see what happens. boston bean Feb 2012 #15
I alerted immediately... when I saw a DU'er called out by name on the Latest threads board Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #19
have you gotten the results yet? boston bean Feb 2012 #20
yeah 3-3 Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #25
no worries, you did what you thought you needed to. boston bean Feb 2012 #38
thank you! i felt like i was under attack Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #42
I don't know of any reason why it would need to be alerted on justiceischeap Feb 2012 #22
The jury thinks this is a fine place for it . boston bean Feb 2012 #32
this is a group discussion about our group. when any group talks about their group seabeyond Feb 2012 #24
Yet justiceischeap Feb 2012 #44
no, you should not take it to Meta iverglas Feb 2012 #18
why are you here? iverglas Feb 2012 #8
I have NO dog in this fight, so I guess I'm sticking up for my fellow DU'er because I Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #17
you dont know what you are talking about but have already drawn conclusions seabeyond Feb 2012 #29
ok. i've already stated 3 or 4 times my reasons for alerting. it's been resolved by jury vote... Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #36
I'm here for the same reason I entered my kids bedroom when they were fighting HereSince1628 Feb 2012 #28
so what should we do? shut up? we have people from outside our group seabeyond Feb 2012 #39
READ THE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE iverglas Feb 2012 #41
FOR THE INFO OF ANYONE COMING HERE VIA A LINK ELSEWHERE ON D.U. iverglas Feb 2012 #11
Verdict on the OP jberryhill Feb 2012 #16
thank you for the info iverglas Feb 2012 #23
i did it Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #26
yes. you did. thank you. and i think you better understand it is not about hurting seabeyond Feb 2012 #45
ok. cool. I'm out for real this time. Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #46
i certainly don't recall voting for Neoma for ANYTHING.... Scout Feb 2012 #60
She was suggested by seabeyond and apparently confirmed by the group justiceischeap Feb 2012 #61
I don't care what seabeyond said or did, she does not speak for me. boston bean Feb 2012 #62
sharing private messages is not appropriate. she needs to resign. Scout Feb 2012 #63
First off, Neoma is the host of the forum through an approved process. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #64
I agree with everything you said. Lisa D Feb 2012 #66
You are leaving out something very important Gormy Cuss boston bean Feb 2012 #67
Yet, there have also been Lisa D Feb 2012 #68
This place is toxic Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #65
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Neoma, you need to resign...»Reply #20