Creative Speculation

Pat Speer used measurements which could be explained and duplicated - far more than anything you've ever managed.

"And the back wound is still above the neck wound!"

If you had bothered to read the text you would have no basis to say this, although it is predictable that you would have said it anyway. I at least read what Lattimer had to say before I critiqued him. You just fire off nasty uninformed dismissals.

"you still can't get your head around the problem of using a non-witness as evidence"

Your argument makes no sense, just as it made no sense when you first offered it.

"Oswald gave the rifle to another "white male, early 30s, appeared to be about 5'-10", 165 lbw."

Oswald was 24, 5' 9", and weighed 131lb at his autopsy. The description you quote was attributed to Howard Brennan, although it would have been impossible to determine height or weight from Brennan's position. Descriptions of Oswald as 5'10" and 165lb do appear in documents generated by FBI and CIA well before the assassination.

Here is my summary:
The diagram you presented is meaningless. The circular arguments you offer lead nowhere. Your legal theories on eyewitness testimony, on expert testimony, and use of physical evidence are inadequate at best, if not essentially dishonest. You need to support your weak arguments with a nasty mocking tone.

"Wm Seger", you introduced yourself on this thread as skeptical but open-minded, and gradually it has been revealed that you are a partisan propagandist who spends apparently much of his time working on deceptive diagrams supporting the Single Bullet Theory and reading up on Neutron Activation Analysis. As a propagandist, you are by nature and trade impervious to reason, to argument, to analysis.