Creative Speculation

> Researcher Pat Speer has written at some length on the single bullet theory...

Perhaps you didn't notice that even with his fudging, he wasn't able to get the back wound down to the level of the throat wound. The best he could do was to lower it an inch or so with a version of the right photo that is so large, it makes JFK's head far wider than it is deep, bearing no resemblance to the proportions of a human skull:



Note the ridiculous disclaimer: "Long hair in photo makes head look deceptively large."
And the back wound is still above the neck wound! That's about on par with the analysis Speer did of the Dale Myers' computer model, which is equally laughable.

> The actual layout of the TSBD staircase rules out the first, the second is just goofy, and the third is not based on what I "would like to use" but is what the actual participants themselves said.

In other words, just as I said, you can't rule out any of those possibilities except by dismissing them out-of-hand, and you still can't get your head around the problem of using a non-witness as evidence. Then you say I'm in denial, huh?

> But there is no evidence Oswald was on the sixth floor at the time, let alone shooting a gun.

Right, after bringing his rifle to work and arranging the boxes in the sniper's nest, Oswald gave the rifle to another "white male, early 30s, appeared to be about 5'-10", 165 lbs." and went downstairs to eat his lunch, while the mystery man shot JFK and disappeared into thin air. And we can be sure that's what happened, because Adams didn't hear him on the stair.

That's all I have time for this morning, and it seems we are getting to the point of repeating ourselves, anyway, so allow me to summarize: None of the claims that you have made that appear to be true are conclusive of a conspiracy, and none of your claims that would be conclusive of a conspiracy have been proved.