Creative Speculation

... and to correct any misunderstandings you think you see in what I'm saying. But you've made claims you can't substantiate, and since you're accusing people of murder and complicity, that should draw an "attack" mode response from anyone who believes that bullshit never did anyone any good. But, no, the only thing my mind is "made up" about is that I need at least one good reason to believe that anyone other than Oswald shot JFK or was involved in it. Do you have one?

Stone's movie is a fantasy, unsupported by any credible evidence. Nit-pick either book all you like -- and indeed JFK conspiracists know more trivia than Trekkies -- and try to poison the well by disparaging the authors, but the main story still emerges unscathed: All the credible evidence says Oswald shot JFK, and no credible evidence implicates anyone else. Speculation is not evidence.

It's notable that after 50 years, conspiracists haven't gathered enough credible evidence to even convince each other what happened.