Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)

12. Shhhhhhhh!!!!!

Reply to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2015, 08:34 PM

Mar 2015

You're sounding nutty.

You can't look at facts when dealing with 9/11. Planes that can penetrate steel and concrete can't hold up to soft dirt or a flock of birds. And flight 93 is still in the ground ins't it? No reason for reconstruction like flight 800 to Paris. As a matter of fact NO reconstruction of any planes for 9/11.

<a href="http://imgur.com/K1V98JO"><img src="" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Germanwings crash has a debris field covering hundreds of yards. [View all] dixiegrrrrl Mar 2015 OP

That was my very first thought as well Dixiegrrrrl Mira Mar 2015 #1

just listening SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2015 #2

The debris fields would not be remotely comparable. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #3

I gently suggest you start digging a little Mira Mar 2015 #4

I gently suggest you are attempting to compare apples, hubcaps and shampoo. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #5

I gently suggest you search a little more zappaman Mar 2015 #6

LOL! Politicalboi Mar 2015 #13

"Digging?" William Seger Mar 2015 #7

Here is what I know for certain: Mira Mar 2015 #8

That's a pretty lame excuse for posting bullshit William Seger Mar 2015 #9

Very well said Politicalboi Mar 2015 #14

I found the Snopes article pretty comprehesive jonno99 Mar 2015 #11

I don't believe that Politicalboi Mar 2015 #15

"jump the shark" William Seger Mar 2015 #18

You don't by chance jonno99 Mar 2015 #20

It is said that oftentimes we don't know what we don't know - so I ask - jonno99 Mar 2015 #19

Dropping 27,000 feet in 8 minutes is a "gradual descent"? Ghost in the Machine Mar 2015 #21

Compared to impacting the ground at a 40 degree down angle? Thor_MN Mar 2015 #22

"Controlled descent rate of 3,000 feet per minute" LOL! Ghost in the Machine Mar 2015 #23

The descent was on autopilot. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #24

It didn't crash into a reclaimed strip mine jberryhill Mar 2015 #10

Here's a picture of the crash site in 1994 Politicalboi Mar 2015 #16

While I find your use of quotation marks around "planes" intriguing... jberryhill Mar 2015 #17

Shhhhhhhh!!!!! Politicalboi Mar 2015 #12