Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftishBrit

(41,307 posts)
21. I was wondering yet again if there could be a look at sources
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 09:56 AM
Jul 2012

Someone linked to uruknet recently. The thread did get locked, but not for about 100 posts. Also, there has been increasing use of right-wing American and British sources. If your source includes either Melanie Phillips OR IfAmericansKnew OR AmericanConservative in its blogroll, the chances are that it's not a very good source!

At one point, I proposed that one should allow right-wing Middle Eastern sources, but not right-wing British or American sources, By now, I'm getting more tempted to propose a ban on the RW Middle Eastern sources too, unless the poster makes clear that they are being used to show one point of view in the ME, not because the poster approves of them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

At this point... Lithos Dec 2011 #1
I might be confused, but don't the admin or that MIR lot deal with TOS violations? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #3
A small future fact Lithos Dec 2011 #4
The same problem would affect quite a few groups I suspect... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #5
When you talk about RKBA Lithos Dec 2011 #6
I'm not good at acronyms. What's RKBA? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #11
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms oberliner Dec 2011 #12
Thanks. The K had me stumped... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #13
Question: WSSlover Apr 2019 #29
So are we on the honor system here? oberliner Dec 2011 #8
You should pin this thread.... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #7
So then is the new I/P group pretty much exactly the same as the old one? Crunchy Frog Dec 2011 #9
LOL Lithos Dec 2011 #10
Are we supposed to give some input with a view to revising the old guidelines? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #14
Are these rules in effect? Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #15
the ones concerning content are Lithos Dec 2011 #16
OK...another quick question. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #17
Thanks for the Info gaelic Jan 2012 #18
I'm not very impressed with how the group has fared under the new system... Violet_Crumble Jun 2012 #19
I can't imagine a jury ever being effective in this group, honestly. Ruby the Liberal Jun 2012 #20
I was wondering yet again if there could be a look at sources LeftishBrit Jul 2012 #21
I'm going to second that request... Violet_Crumble Jul 2012 #22
Baffling hidden OP.... shira Aug 2012 #23
I'm curious. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #24
The history has always to allow material related to Israel and/or Palestine here Lithos Feb 2014 #25
The history doesn't seem to be supported by the I/P guidlnes. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #26
To Lithos. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2014 #27
The rules are not deprecated and they still apply Lithos Aug 2014 #28
That response didn't date too well Violet_Crumble Oct 2023 #30
Hi, good to see you, my friend Lithos Oct 2023 #31
It's great to see you again, too Violet_Crumble Oct 2023 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Old I/P guidelines (for r...»Reply #21