That was, after all, the claim from the OP. Israel gets labeled that way all the time. Other occupiers, never. Not once, ever.
Stick to the precise terminology in the OP. Don't make up your own claims, pretend that's what the OP argues, and then shoot down those straw mans. I wonder, is this deliberate on your part?
To help you out...
1. The U.N. has not called any of these countries an Occupying Power. Not even once.
2. Since 1967, General Assembly resolutions have referred to Israeli-held territories as occupied 2,342 times, while the territories mentioned above are referred to as occupied a mere 16 times combined.
3. Similarly, Security Council resolutions refer to the disputed territories in the Israeli-Arab conflict as occupied 31 times, but only a total of five times in reference to all seven other conflicts combined.
4. General Assembly resolutions employ the term grave to describe Israels actions 513 times, as opposed to 14 total for all the other conflicts,
5. Verbs such as condemn and deplore are sprinkled into Israel-related resolutions tens more times than they are in resolutions about other conflicts, setting a unique tone of disdain.
6. Israel has been reminded by resolutions against it of the countrys obligations under the Geneva Conventions about 500 times since 1967as opposed to two times for the other situations.
7. However, the U.N. has only used the legally loaded word settlements to describe Israeli civilian communities (256 times by the GA and 17 by the Security Council). Neither body has ever used that word in relation to any other country with settlers in occupied territory.
7 claims there.
Prove any one of them false.
Or punt.