Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
16. "It stopped being a Jewish temple"
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 07:44 PM
Oct 2015

The Siege of Jerusalem in the year 70 was the decisive event of the First Jewish–Roman War. The Roman army, led by the future Emperor Titus, with Tiberius Julius Alexander as his second-in-command, besieged and conquered the city of Jerusalem, which had been occupied by its Jewish defenders in 66.

The siege ended with the sacking of the city and the destruction of its famous Second Temple. The destruction of both the first and second temples is still mourned annually as the Jewish fast Tisha B'Av. The Arch of Titus, celebrating the Roman sack of Jerusalem and the Temple, still stands in Rome.

Josephus claims that 1.1 million people were killed during the siege, of which a majority were Jewish, and that 97,000 were captured and enslaved, including Simon bar Giora and John of Giscala.

"The slaughter within was even more dreadful than the spectacle from without. Men and women, old and young, insurgents and priests, those who fought and those who entreated mercy, were hewn down in indiscriminate carnage. The number of the slain exceeded that of the slayers. The legionaries had to clamber over heaps of dead to carry on the work of extermination."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(70_CE)

Kinda like how the Great Synagogue of Warsaw "stopped being a synagogue".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pure, undiluted Antisemitism. Mosby Oct 2015 #1
You notice not one anti-Zionist here called out UNESCO for its Jew hatred? n/t shira Apr 2016 #88
The world's gone mad. grossproffit Oct 2015 #2
"I find it fascinating that people still take that insane asylum called the UN seriously." R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #3
You know what's ironic? Mosby Oct 2015 #4
Yep King_David Oct 2015 #11
How is that ironic? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #20
Bernie Sanders speaks thinks and has the same mannerisms as my dad and my uncles and friends King_David Oct 2015 #22
And? Where's the irony? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #23
Was just a tidbit. nt King_David Oct 2015 #24
Don't bother waiting for a cogent answer. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #28
I take it you agree with the UN draft resolution? n/t shira Oct 2015 #5
I just love the irony of your post and the other complainers. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #26
Gee, you didn't answer yet another simple question... shira Oct 2015 #32
I've made my feelings known many times here R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #46
But you're incapable of answering right here, right now... shira Oct 2015 #55
"Are you waiting for Mondoweiss or some other pro-BDS..." R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #63
Still waiting for an answer. n/t shira Oct 2015 #64
Yes, I am...waiting. What were you suggesting about Mondoweiss or BDS? R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #65
Bibi the bone crusher? oberliner Oct 2015 #15
For an expert who thinks he's a spokesman for the Palestinians King_David Oct 2015 #25
Why would one alert on inconsequential posts? R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #53
Same reason "one" would alert on any post to silence debate here. n/t shira Oct 2015 #56
If you've ever read ATA on this subject then you would know that what you are suggesting R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #62
Temple Mount 2,000+ years old, Islam 1,500 years old shenmue Oct 2015 #6
The part where it stopped being a Jewish temple, mostly Scootaloo Oct 2015 #10
"It stopped being a Jewish temple" oberliner Oct 2015 #16
Yup, pretty much like that. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #18
Exactly King_David Oct 2015 #14
Combined time of the 1st and second temple...wherever they stood: 900 years R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2015 #27
So because the Jews didn't leftynyc Nov 2015 #73
Your perspective is in need of corrective lenses. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #74
I think they descreated leftynyc Nov 2015 #75
so, do you dream of the day your tribe destroys the Dome of the Rock geek tragedy Nov 2015 #77
What a wonderfully crafted sophomoric reply. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #79
LOL leftynyc Nov 2015 #80
Those are the famous last words of one R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #81
some problems with your statements sabbat hunter Apr 2016 #91
Wow. You must be really bored to reply to my post after six months. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #92
Your math. R. Daneel Olivaw Nov 2015 #82
Since when are Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates... Scootaloo Oct 2015 #7
So how do you like this UN draft resolution? For or Against? n/t shira Oct 2015 #12
Indifferent. Scootaloo Oct 2015 #13
Absolutely against The Green Manalishi Apr 2016 #89
How about respecting Judaism? oberliner Oct 2015 #17
Same answer. Since when are favors expected? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #19
Where do you get your ideas from? Show us where Israel wants their treaty w/ Jordan..... shira Oct 2015 #31
I am just suggesting that it would not have to be seen as a favor to Israel oberliner Oct 2015 #42
up until the recent rise of revisionist Zionist Rabbi's , most traditional Rabbi's azurnoir Oct 2015 #39
No kidding oberliner Oct 2015 #40
Who cares what some Rabbis say? 90% of Jews aren't observant anyway.... shira Oct 2015 #57
I'd ask the Jordanians about that azurnoir Oct 2015 #59
I'm asking you. You don't have an opinion? n/t shira Oct 2015 #60
Lol King_David Oct 2015 #8
The BDS'ers here will support that one too. Mark it down. n/t shira Oct 2015 #9
This resolution wouldn't have seen the light of day if Israel hadn't tried to change the status quo Little Tich Oct 2015 #21
In the real world, Israel isn't trying to change the status quo. shira Oct 2015 #30
Interestingly, I think you're the only one in the I/P group who denies that Israel was trying Little Tich Oct 2015 #35
None of that happened - and won't happen. What else do you have? shira Oct 2015 #58
It was the protests and nothing else that stopped Israel from changing the status quo. Little Tich Oct 2015 #66
Yes, heaven forbid Jews sully leftynyc Nov 2015 #78
If democratic values make you nauseous, maybe you're posting in the wrong forum. Little Tich Nov 2015 #83
You've really stepped in it this time leftynyc Nov 2015 #84
If you can't even understand your own argument, ther's nothing I can do... n/t Little Tich Nov 2015 #85
LOL leftynyc Nov 2015 #86
The UN has become a parody of its former self. Shame on them. grossproffit Oct 2015 #29
I disagree. They've been a parody of their former self since at least 1975. shira Oct 2015 #33
Let's be clear. This resolution is an act of Jew hatred. 6chars Oct 2015 #38
The UN is working exactly as it's supposed to since it's creation, and that's the problem. aranthus Oct 2015 #41
This is the resolution- it is at it's heart a cease and desist order for Israels actions wrt al aqsa azurnoir Oct 2015 #34
That's not the resolution oberliner Oct 2015 #36
you hand us a 200+ page pdf were in nothing in the table of contents refers to the subject of this azurnoir Oct 2015 #37
You have no idea what you are talking about oberliner Oct 2015 #43
Lol I provided the draft resolution itself let's repost it here azurnoir Oct 2015 #44
No, you didn't oberliner Oct 2015 #45
you have failed to produce a cut and paste of the section you claim exists azurnoir Oct 2015 #47
OK oberliner Oct 2015 #48
it is virtually the same as what I posted azurnoir Oct 2015 #49
Except what you posted doesn't include the part that is controversial oberliner Oct 2015 #50
here is the only mention of the Wall and I see why Ms Bokova said "could be" azurnoir Oct 2015 #51
Check #18 oberliner Oct 2015 #52
18. Affirms that the Mughrabi Ascent is an integral and inseparable part of Al Aqsa Mosque/ Al-Haram azurnoir Oct 2015 #54
Have you read the OP? oberliner Oct 2015 #61
aha I see azurnoir Oct 2015 #67
the only thing that 'confuses' me is why no one can produce a document with that wording azurnoir Oct 2015 #68
Because it hasn't been submitted for a vote oberliner Oct 2015 #69
Yes it has and it passed I noted in the above post what was changed prior to being submitted azurnoir Oct 2015 #70
No it hasn't oberliner Oct 2015 #71
That's essentially an uncredited reprint of the article I posted, the resolution passed azurnoir Oct 2015 #72
Oh, this is absolutely Anti-Semitism. DetlefK Nov 2015 #76
UNESCO: Jews Have No Connection to the Temple Mount shira Apr 2016 #87
I was in Israel in October leftynyc Apr 2016 #90
UNESCO acting like ISIS, trying to erase history. n/t shira Apr 2016 #93
I hadn't made that connection leftynyc Apr 2016 #94
UNESCO Director distances herself from Temple Mount decision shira May 2016 #95
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»UNESCO draft resolution: ...»Reply #16