Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(63,802 posts)
10. The state constitution regulates the disposition of surplus government property.
Wed Nov 6, 2019, 11:57 PM
Nov 2019

It's a power of the purse function. Until now, police dogs and horses have been considered property just like a patrol car. This has been a problem in other states too.

Per Propsition 10' ballot summary:

https://www.alamovotesblue.org/uploads/1/2/8/9/128992682/pros_and_cons_proposition_10.pdf

Background
• Law enforcement animals are considered ‘property’ of the state agency, county, municipality
etc.
• The Constitution requires all surplus governmental property to be auctioned, donated, or
destroyed.
• The proposed amendment would allow the animal to be transferred to its former caretaker at
no cost.

The U.S. constitution gives Congress that authority over federal property, and they changed the law for federal dogs in 2000.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights»Texas: Retired police dog...»Reply #10