Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
1. A lot of companies have recently changed animal testing policies in order to sell in China,
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 05:53 AM
Mar 2013

or non-testing companies have been bought by larger conglomerates that test. My guess would be that some of the conflicts are coming from that? I've seen different lists handle the subsidiary issue differently, in particular.

If Sparkly Sunshine Makeup Company never, ever tests on animals but they get bought out by Big Giant Household Goods Company who tests many of their other products, some lists will list Sparkly Sunshine as acceptable, some will do so with an asterisk explaining the issue, and some will remove them from their lists entirely when they get bought out by Big Giant Household Goods. Then later on if BGHG decides to sell their wildly popular Sparkly Sunshine line in China, where animal testing is mandatory, some lists get updated and some don't.

When in doubt I'd look at the company's website. If they have a strong anti-testing policy they'll generally have that prominently mentioned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights»Cosmetics / shampoos / bo...»Reply #1