Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

thought crime

(1,628 posts)

6. There isn't one word of fossil fuel promotion in the OP's post.

Reply to NNadir (Reply #5)

Fri Apr 10, 2026, 03:23 PM

Friday

Criticism of nuclear energy doesn't equate to promotion of fossil fuels, any more than criticism of renewable energy equates to promotion of fossil fuels. That's a logical fallacy and a deceptive argument.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Radioactive Water Discharged into Hudson River for Decades [View all] Caribbeans Friday OP

That's... Scary, to say the least. 🙁 Dave Bowman Friday #1

Of all the negative stuff being exposed/revealed/reported today, sprinkleeninow Friday #2

OH MY GOD!!!!! EVERYONE in New York must have died! NNadir Friday #3

And, again. Thanks. For your continuing efforts to interject a modicum of common sense stopdiggin Friday #4

You're very welcome. I consider the rhetoric of antinukes to be fossil fuel promotion. NNadir Friday #5

There isn't one word of fossil fuel promotion in the OP's post. thought crime Friday #6

Radioactive material poured into a river is a valid concern. Hydrogen is NOT a fossil fuel. Nor is it radioactive. thought crime Friday #7

This is a serious concern. Water is an ultra-precious resource. thought crime Friday #8