Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NNadir

(38,168 posts)

5. You're very welcome. I consider the rhetoric of antinukes to be fossil fuel promotion.

Reply to stopdiggin (Reply #4)

Fri Apr 10, 2026, 02:01 AM

Friday

I consider everything ever written here by the author this OP to be fossil fuel promotion, no exceptions.

Of course the fossil fuel industry bad mouths nuclear energy. It is the only technology capable of eliminating the use of fossil fuels.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Radioactive Water Discharged into Hudson River for Decades [View all] Caribbeans Friday OP

That's... Scary, to say the least. 🙁 Dave Bowman Friday #1

Of all the negative stuff being exposed/revealed/reported today, sprinkleeninow Friday #2

OH MY GOD!!!!! EVERYONE in New York must have died! NNadir Friday #3

And, again. Thanks. For your continuing efforts to interject a modicum of common sense stopdiggin Friday #4

You're very welcome. I consider the rhetoric of antinukes to be fossil fuel promotion. NNadir Friday #5

There isn't one word of fossil fuel promotion in the OP's post. thought crime Friday #6

Radioactive material poured into a river is a valid concern. Hydrogen is NOT a fossil fuel. Nor is it radioactive. thought crime Friday #7

This is a serious concern. Water is an ultra-precious resource. thought crime Friday #8