Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thought crime

(1,265 posts)
14. The table and site YOU referenced said 2050.
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 04:54 PM
Tuesday
You displayed the table I mentioned as "data". You linked to the iea.org site where the table came from. I merely quoted from the same iea.org site. I hope that's okay. "This "by XXXX" shit" is what you displayed in your previous response.

You made claims about renewable energy but when I followed up I just found more reason to hope renewables achieve some real action against climate change. It looks like innovation and flexibility are favoring the use of renewable energy at industrial scale. That's a good thing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trump's wind energy assau...»Reply #14