Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Think. Again.

(22,330 posts)

8. Except that renewable methods of storage like H2 are part of the clean energy transition.

Reply to NNadir (Reply #7)

Fri Mar 28, 2025, 04:12 PM

Mar 28

And as I've mentioned before, I agree that nuclear is an important part of the coming non-CO2 energy industry, but I disagree with you that it is possible to run our societies on only grid-connected nuclear, and it wrong to discourage all of the other forms of non-CO2 energy production and storage that are far more practical in so many various scenarios.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Renewables Reach Record 50.8% of UK Generation in 2024 [View all] Think. Again. Mar 28 OP

Wow!!!! Over the last 12 months Britain's carbon intensity was only... NNadir Mar 28 #1

Yes, as everyone (should) know... Think. Again. Mar 28 #2

Bullshit. Carbon intensity of electrical generation has not a fucking thing to do with population. NNadir Mar 28 #3

Wuh? Think. Again. Mar 28 #4

I was perfectly clear. NNadir Mar 28 #5

I see, yes, an investment of CO2 must be made... Think. Again. Mar 28 #6

Bullshit again. When the wind doesn't blow and the sun doesn't shine... NNadir Mar 28 #7

Except that renewable methods of storage like H2 are part of the clean energy transition. Think. Again. Mar 28 #8