Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Wednesdays

(20,464 posts)

4. Took me a while to figure out what the OP was about

Reply to hatrack (Original post)

Mon Mar 24, 2025, 12:18 PM

Mar 24

430 per million what? Chlorine? Sandwiches? Mudkips?

Also, what would a "good" number have been? What are the historical stats on that? I know we could look it up, but that would have saved us all the trouble.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

March 23 2025 - On The Very Edge Of 430 Parts Per Million [View all] hatrack Mar 24 OP

This why Musk/Trump are working to shut down the NOAA climate observatory on Mt. Mauna Loa Botany Mar 24 #1

Absolutely! SheltieLover Mar 24 #3

We had a daily reading over 430 on March 7 and again on March 10. NNadir Mar 24 #2

Oh, interesting - didn't know it had arrived as early as that . . . hatrack Mar 24 #5

I check it most every day. I'll miss it when King Eloon shuts it. NNadir Mar 24 #7

Took me a while to figure out what the OP was about Wednesdays Mar 24 #4

When daily tracking began in 1958, it was 315 ppm . . . hatrack Mar 24 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author ZDU Mar 24 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author ZDU Mar 24 #9

It has not been this high for 800,000 years at least IbogaProject Mar 25 #10

Here is a site by a Rutgers professor and another Academic from Australia IbogaProject Mar 25 #11