Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,841 posts)
4. I was referring to the laws of thermodynamics, not the historical success of idiots in attacking nuclear energy and...
Sat Dec 14, 2024, 08:25 AM
Dec 14

...their total indifference to fossil fuels, which rings true continuously, and disregards the relative amounts of money squandered of "renewable energy" in contrast to that invested in nuclear.

I note that "renewable energy" also includes some very dubious enterprises, the destruction of major river systems and the combustion of biomass, burning strip mined forests in power plants.

The questions being avoided with this garbage response is "do batteries waste energy?" and "is the status quo, involving the success of people who couldn't care less about fossil fuels but hate nuclear energy, resulting in the collapse of the atmosphere?"

Let's put it this way: Hydrogen and battery bullshit has been handed out here and elsewhere for more than 2 decades.
Is it resulting in reductions of fossil fuel use, or the increase in rates of release of fossil fuel waste?

I'm interested in fossil fuel elimination, not attacking the most viable tool for doing so.

Got it?

No?

I didn't think so.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Factorial Unveils 40Ah Al...»Reply #4