Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(39,379 posts)
5. I think it's shameful this area was excluded from the Chumash Marine Sanctuary.
Mon Nov 11, 2024, 05:40 PM
Nov 2024

This project will serve only to prolong California's dependence on natural gas and do absolutely nothing in the long run to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses humans end up dumping into earth's atmosphere before our fossil fueled civilization collapses.

Even a twin of the Vogtle 4 nuclear power plant would have a smaller environmental footprint and provide lower cost electricity than most hybrid gas / wind / battery power schemes.

The only way to quit fossil fuels is to quit fossil fuels. Wind projects are entirely dependent on natural gas and other fossil fuels for their economic viability. They cannot displace fossil fuels entirely, which is something we need to do.

The upcoming battle between Old Money / Russian billionaire oil and gas interests, and the billionaire tech-bros nuclear power enthusiasts is going to be interesting. Trump and Musk are going with the Old Money / Russian interests. Wind and solar are still working for them.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trump has vowed to kill U...»Reply #5