Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(61,202 posts)
5. Encouraging if true, but . . .
Wed Jun 12, 2024, 03:29 PM
Jun 2024

A. Bloomberg NEF focuses (as I understand it) on energy markets, new technologies, electrical grids, industrial GHG outputs and automobile sales. Deriving emissions totals from these activities matters very much, but . . .

B. I am uncertain as to how closely Bloomberg NEF focuses on land use, agriculture (especially by-products of chemical fertilizer breakdown), changes in albedo from deforestation and so forth.

C. Bloomberg NEF is not presenting its findings in Nature or Science or PNAS or Geophysical Review Letters ( you get my drift).

D. Results from direct instrumental measurements of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere continue to rise.

So yeah, encouraging if true, but color me skeptical as to whether this encompasses the whole story, or even if we should feel encouraged by it.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Global Emissions in Decli...»Reply #5