Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,083 posts)
5. Thanks for the links - it was a nice, long interview - that could have used better questions
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:30 PM
May 2012

The JP Morgan comments were very good and went to spelling out the big difference in the parties. I also think that, given the circumstances that it would have been unusual if JK were not asked about Edwards. His answer reflected the complex man he is. He had the honesty to say that he had been disappointed by Edwards in the 2004 campaign. It was clear that was the case - as ALL the Kerry people could not stand Edwards by 2006. Just the fact that Kerry pointedly said nothing about Edwards - as he praised the rest of the Democratic field always suggested that he still followed what his parents likely told him of saying nothing if you can't say anything positive. His respect for law and his genuine compassion for the Edwards kids was obvious.

I think the newscasters were on their better behavior when he was there - except for the repeated SoS comments. I concur with your impression that the people who seemed normal and informed were positive about Kerry.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Kerry's interview on OTR/...»Reply #5