Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Weird News

In reply to the discussion: No no no dig up stupid [View all]

muriel_volestrangler

(102,754 posts)
2. He really is looking to get some sort of contempt of court ruling against him
Tue May 12, 2020, 01:06 PM
May 2020
David Ostrom filed a second motion Friday asking that he be allowed to spend parenting time with his children and that he be reimbursed for $4,765 in legal fees and $2,200 for the psychological evaluation. The motion also seeks $255,000 for emotional damages.
...
David Ostrom previously told the Register he filed the trial by combat request in an attempt to get media attention and with the hope it could lead to both parties airing their grievances in front of a judge and reach a resolution.

So he admits to the media that he fucked around with court procedure to get media attention, and then asks to be reimbursed for the consequences of him fucking around. And to get "emotional damages" for what he started. If I were a judge, I'd be noting his complete lack of responsibility in public life, and using it in my judgment of his fitness to have any responsibility for his child.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Weird News»No no no dig up stupid»Reply #2