Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. IOW, you want to keep people from having their votes counted
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 07:59 PM
Jan 2013

--and care more about a silly stupid superstition than about actual data. I live in WA, and it was also very nice for me to know for the most part what the likely results were before bedtime. What in goddam hell prevents you from comprehending the statement

Both King and Multnomah tallied about 60 percent of ballots cast shortly after the polls closed Tuesday night and reported the results
?

Receiving ballots on Election Day vs the day after has FUCKALL to do with these 100% IDENTICAL results in WA and OR. Both states totally and utterly fail to keep up with signature validation on Election Day. Yes, it's nice that OR taxpayers pay extra to keep election workers working nights and weekends to clear the backlog faster, and it would be nice if WA would pony up the necessary bucks as well. But this has zero relationship to when ballots are received.

Just about ALL of WA elections were called the day after Election Day, and only the close ones required waiting until the end of the week. And if an election is that close, it's all the more imperative to do it right rather than fast.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»My Testimony Against Wash...»Reply #2