Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mojowork_n

(2,354 posts)
16. You might be right.
Wed Oct 24, 2012, 10:51 PM
Oct 2012

That was my first thought, too. But going back to the taking-cookies-away comparison, it
just looks like there's a slightly steeper slope to the Santorum line. And the math needed to
reduce his actually winning the election might add up to a few more cookies having been
swiped off of his totals. ...Either way, it would be good to have a better and easier to follow
breakdown of the numbers.

Adding an overview of the "overall pattern" of crying foul on vote fraud, GOP columnists
coming out today attacking early, in-person voting (not the same as requesting a mail-in
absentee ballot and sending one of those in, which is something you shouldn't do), the
struggles in courts all over the country....

This poster at dKos summarized it nicely:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/21/1148037/-GOP-Controlled-VSBE-REFUSES-to-Prosecute-Election-Fraud

The GOP has endorsed election fraud as a means to winning in Virginia. This calls into question EVERY state where the GOP controls the mechanisms of prosecution and running the election....The GOP has its October Surprise and that "surprise" is saying this:

We will lie, cheat, and steal to win this election and there's not a damned thing anybody can do to stop us!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We all need to send this to Maddow. Binders Keepers Oct 2012 #1
Hey, welcome to D.U. mojowork_n Oct 2012 #7
kick n/t southern_belle Oct 2012 #2
K gateley Oct 2012 #3
K&R silverweb Oct 2012 #4
Wonder of those votes were flipped by machines owned by Romney son and would-be beac Oct 2012 #5
Wisconsin did use the SEQ-AVC Edge II 5.0.24 voting machine siligut Oct 2012 #9
It was the "new lamps for old" (the old Aladdin con) that... mojowork_n Oct 2012 #12
May I also suggest you cross-post this in the Politics 2012 forum where it will beac Oct 2012 #6
I actually have to shut off this computer -- right now -- to go home. mojowork_n Oct 2012 #8
That graph is just not right. DollarBillHines Oct 2012 #10
I'm thinking of it this way.... mojowork_n Oct 2012 #11
My take on it is slightly different DollarBillHines Oct 2012 #15
You might be right. mojowork_n Oct 2012 #16
I do think you have to examine alternative explanations ThoughtCriminal Oct 2012 #13
This pattern showed up in *EVERY* other Republican primary. mojowork_n Oct 2012 #14
A poster already posted that there was a problem with the E-Ballot in Texas siligut Oct 2012 #17
Mojowork => Many thanks for posting this <= autorank Oct 2012 #18
Thank you Michael, your article is clear and persuasive siligut Oct 2012 #19
There is this article that a FaceBook friend posted along the same lines. livvy Oct 2012 #20
Spam deleted by NRaleighLiberal (MIR Team) TheNaimSadik Oct 2012 #21
Spam deleted by bluesbassman (MIR Team) NolanDvorak Dec 2012 #22
The pattern of major exit poll discrepancies began with the 1988 NH Republican primary Cliff Arnebeck Jan 2013 #23
Welcome to D.U. mojowork_n Jan 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Precinct-by-precinct vote...»Reply #16