Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

United Kingdom

Showing Original Post only (View all)

muriel_volestrangler

(103,266 posts)
Fri Jul 21, 2023, 02:42 PM Jul 2023

Can anyone explain the Dan Wootton "Martin Branning" story? Am I naive? [View all]

The Sun’s parent company has hired external lawyers to help investigate “very serious” allegations regarding Dan Wootton’s time at the tabloid, the Guardian has been told.

Wootton is facing allegations he used a pseudonym to secretly offer current and former Sun colleagues tens of thousands of pounds in return for sexual material.
...
The presenter denied any illegal behaviour but he did not directly address whether he had ever sent emails using the name Martin Branning. It is claimed that this pseudonym was used during Wootton’s time at the Sun to approach many serving and former Sun employees with the offer of five-figure sums in return for performing sex acts on camera.

The Guardian has spoken to seven current and former Sun employees who say they received emails from Martin Branning – understood to be a portmanteau of EastEnders characters Martin Fowler and Max Branning. All claim they were offered large sums of money in return for pictures.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/jul/19/news-uk-hires-lawyers-to-look-at-claims-against-former-sun-columnist

An ex-boyfriend of Wootton says he used the "Martin Branning" pseudonym.

What I can't understand is how he (or anyone else using a pesudonym) expects an anonymous solicitation for something that would probably leave you open to blackmail would be received. Is it that the "five figure sum" was really substantial to the recipient, and that they knew they would face little embarrassment if it was made public (eg if it was Wootton, he knew they didn't earn that much, and/or were unattached)? Or was "Branning" just confident the connection to the real person would never be made, so that it was all worth a try?

Is there something unsaid that I'm missing here?
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Can anyone explain the Da...»Reply #0