Canada

Saying Harper is "suspicious, secretive, vindictive and has eruptions of white-hot rage" reinforces what many already knew but I had not connected the dangerous similarities to Nixon until reading this, kudos to Flanagan for making the connection.

Being of a somewhat cynical person, I can't help but wonder why Flanagan, a died-in-the-wool Con, is coming out with this. Is this preparing the field for a 'favored' candidate to fill Harper's seat, could that 'favored' candidate be Flanagan himself?

I don't trust any Con to simply tell the truth without a hidden agenda, they are incapable of doing so, imo.