Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SorellaLaBefana

(257 posts)
4. Yep. And Ballot Order has been shown to be important!
Mon Nov 4, 2024, 08:22 AM
Nov 4

Posted on this recently when we filled out our ballots. It was so disheartening. Had no idea of what the *origin* of this was—simply assumed was Corruption—and not, as you have reported, Chance.

The first thing which struck us was that the ‘Republican’ (remember when that was not MAGA?) candidate was always the first listed for each position.

I seemed to recall, and was able to confirm, that multiple studies over decades have shown that the first candidate listed is more likely to receive a disproportionate share of the votes contrasted with those further down the listed order.

There are about half-a-dozen frequently quoted studies showing this ‘Primacy’ or ‘Ballot Listing Position Effect’...
.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Ever wonder why in Texas ...»Reply #4