Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_pa_042722/
So I expect based on the above, a similar thing was done with Franklin & Marshall where the "low number" is actually just surveying the one party and the total surveyed is more in the same "800" range. I know these state polls always have a smaller number of voters than the major media polling outfits.
And to this comment -
METHODOLOGY
The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from April 20 to 25, 2022 with a probability-based random sample of Pennsylvania voters drawn from a list of registered voters who participated in at least one primary election since 2016. Interviews were conducted by a live telephone interviewer, in English, with 406 registered Democrats (113 landline and 293 cell phone) and 407 registered Republicans (133 landline and 274 cell phone).
The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from April 20 to 25, 2022 with a probability-based random sample of Pennsylvania voters drawn from a list of registered voters who participated in at least one primary election since 2016. Interviews were conducted by a live telephone interviewer, in English, with 406 registered Democrats (113 landline and 293 cell phone) and 407 registered Republicans (133 landline and 274 cell phone).
So I expect based on the above, a similar thing was done with Franklin & Marshall where the "low number" is actually just surveying the one party and the total surveyed is more in the same "800" range. I know these state polls always have a smaller number of voters than the major media polling outfits.
And to this comment -
However the recent challenge to Roe v Wade and the suggestion that SCOTUS may reverse its ruling, proof that aggressive Democratic leadership is needed in the Senate
Link to tweet
John Fetterman
@JohnFetterman
Taking notes for Democrats
Image
3:58 PM · May 6, 2022
@JohnFetterman
Taking notes for Democrats
Image
3:58 PM · May 6, 2022
Link to tweet
John Fetterman
@JohnFetterman
If Roe is overturned, 36 million women would lose power over their own bodies + lives.
It’s not for politicians to judge how and when to become a parent.
Send me to the U.S. Senate, and I'd *proudly* be the 51st vote to scrap the filibuster + codify Roe v. Wade.
1:43 PM · May 3, 2022
@JohnFetterman
If Roe is overturned, 36 million women would lose power over their own bodies + lives.
It’s not for politicians to judge how and when to become a parent.
Send me to the U.S. Senate, and I'd *proudly* be the 51st vote to scrap the filibuster + codify Roe v. Wade.
1:43 PM · May 3, 2022
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read