Montana

in doing so, w/o impacting their own voters too, negatively.

I'm already expecting some kind of crazy convoluted logic in their explanation to me, sort of like the logic (?) conveyed by djt in trying to explain anything...using his 'weave' technique.

Republicans have never been really good w/ explanations (and I'm biased here, so forgive me (or not!)), when they could say all along that it's solely for the tax cuts for their wealthy friends and that's it. That's all they have to say.

Now of course most people would want a far better rational for tax cuts for the top 1% or so people, such as the very logical one that if the 1% get tax cuts, they wouldn't spend it, thus it doesn't stimulate the economy, whereas if you cut taxes for those making from $25K to $100K, you stimulate the economy much more (have a higher velocity of money in short, the money goes further).