Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Michigan

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)

4. One would think that opening up very low-population density areas first makes the most sense

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Sun May 3, 2020, 11:38 PM

May 2020

From a safety standpoint.

But ... that plan also implies the minimum positive economic impact.

Also I'm pretty sure that the grown-up children we've been seeing in MI lately would throw an even bigger tantrum if only part of their state opened up.

Their not understanding simple math in the first place, plus the fact they want to bitch about anything Witmer does, pretty much guarantees that outcome.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Few coronavirus cases, lots of land. Should northern Michigan reopen? [View all] TexasTowelie May 2020 OP

I guess if they feel cheated out of their fare share. ret5hd May 2020 #1

An ounce... Newest Reality May 2020 #2

I'll smoke one of those RGinNJ May 2020 #5

A good place for folks of the lower counties to visit for a few months. keithbvadu2 May 2020 #3

One would think that opening up very low-population density areas first makes the most sense mr_lebowski May 2020 #4

The only problem with that James48 May 2020 #6