Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

merrily

(45,251 posts)

23. Then why post again?

Reply to MADem (Reply #22)

Mon Sep 29, 2014, 02:53 PM

Sep 2014

You are saying nothing new and I've already stated that I've owned the OP since I posted it and never disavowed a word of it---despite several efforts on your part to make posting it seem wrong. So, what is the point of Reply 22? Just to have the last word?

Besides, where you chose to focus and whom you chose to instruct about what to post is definitely about you.

Your reply to this, if you make one, will be the last word because I will not reply. So have at it. Or not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

As with Scott Brown first run, Baker's side is using ads [View all] merrily Sep 2014 OP

Coakley has some YarnAddict Sep 2014 #1

Not that I've heard. merrily Sep 2014 #2

It did come up in 2010. Dawson Leery Sep 2014 #3

As stated, though, it could not have been a big issue for voters, or she merrily Sep 2014 #4

There was something else, too YarnAddict Sep 2014 #11

I took your Reply 1 to be a genuine question. Your reply 11 merrily Sep 2014 #13

No point YarnAddict Sep 2014 #14

Charlie Baker has a "woman" problem. He doesn't think NFL enablers should be fired, and he calls MADem Sep 2014 #12

It probably wont. It came and went during the 2010 primary. Mass Sep 2014 #24

Any oppo ad against Baker needs to use this soundtrack.... MADem Sep 2014 #5

I'd choose Coakley over Baker for many reasons. merrily Sep 2014 #6

In the sense of being good at campaigning. merrily Sep 2014 #7

She made it through the primary process--I drove a few dozen people to the polls to vote for her. MADem Sep 2014 #8

I posted that she is the superior candidate and will make a good Governor. merrily Sep 2014 #9

OK. nt MADem Sep 2014 #10

When I compare replies 1, 3 and 11 on this thread merrily Sep 2014 #15

Not sure why you have a problem with me, but this isn't the first time you've MADem Sep 2014 #16

right back at you. merrily Sep 2014 #17

Here, let me quote from YOUR OP...the post that lit OFF this thread. MADem Sep 2014 #18

Non responsive, I know what the OP says and I've already merrily Sep 2014 #19

It's entirely responsive. This is your thread, you wrote the disparaging comments about Coakley, MADem Sep 2014 #20

It's nonresponsive to Reply 17, to which it purports to reply. merrily Sep 2014 #21

I think I've made my (responsive) views entirely clear. MADem Sep 2014 #22

Then why post again? merrily Sep 2014 #23