Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

Showing Original Post only (View all)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 12:27 PM Sep 2014

As with Scott Brown first run, Baker's side is using ads [View all]

that try to give the impression that Democrats will be voting for Baker--and also that some Democratic votes for Baker are significant.

Worked for Brown. Hope it doesn't work for Baker. Brown at least found to endorse him several officials who at some point had been elected to office as Democrats.

The PAC ad showing Coakley floundering when asked about the gasoline tax, then missing the right answer by a lot does not cheer me up, either.

I don't much care about day to day stuff because the legislature can override as many gubernatorial vetoes as it wishes to override. But, there are court appointments and filling vacancies, which makes someone an incumbent and therefore harder to beat.

I wish Democrats had put forward someone other than Coakley. I think her heart is usually in the right place and obviously want her to win. But, she can't win unless she is a good candidate. She made an awful candidate against Brown. While I think she has learned a lot since, I am still uneasy. And Baker is ever so slick. Much like carpetbagger Romney, Baker will make a good candidate and, if he wins, a lousy governor.







24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coakley has some YarnAddict Sep 2014 #1
Not that I've heard. merrily Sep 2014 #2
It did come up in 2010. Dawson Leery Sep 2014 #3
As stated, though, it could not have been a big issue for voters, or she merrily Sep 2014 #4
There was something else, too YarnAddict Sep 2014 #11
I took your Reply 1 to be a genuine question. Your reply 11 merrily Sep 2014 #13
No point YarnAddict Sep 2014 #14
Charlie Baker has a "woman" problem. He doesn't think NFL enablers should be fired, and he calls MADem Sep 2014 #12
It probably wont. It came and went during the 2010 primary. Mass Sep 2014 #24
Any oppo ad against Baker needs to use this soundtrack.... MADem Sep 2014 #5
I'd choose Coakley over Baker for many reasons. merrily Sep 2014 #6
In the sense of being good at campaigning. merrily Sep 2014 #7
She made it through the primary process--I drove a few dozen people to the polls to vote for her. MADem Sep 2014 #8
I posted that she is the superior candidate and will make a good Governor. merrily Sep 2014 #9
OK. nt MADem Sep 2014 #10
When I compare replies 1, 3 and 11 on this thread merrily Sep 2014 #15
Not sure why you have a problem with me, but this isn't the first time you've MADem Sep 2014 #16
right back at you. merrily Sep 2014 #17
Here, let me quote from YOUR OP...the post that lit OFF this thread. MADem Sep 2014 #18
Non responsive, I know what the OP says and I've already merrily Sep 2014 #19
It's entirely responsive. This is your thread, you wrote the disparaging comments about Coakley, MADem Sep 2014 #20
It's nonresponsive to Reply 17, to which it purports to reply. merrily Sep 2014 #21
I think I've made my (responsive) views entirely clear. MADem Sep 2014 #22
Then why post again? merrily Sep 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»As with Scott Brown first...»Reply #0