Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rurallib

(63,364 posts)
1. HSB 165 is a backdoor attack at IPERS (Iowa retirement System)
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 07:05 PM
Apr 2019

aimed at municipal workers. From Kirsten Running-Marquardt's newsletter:


New GOP Bill Puts IPERS, Retirement Security at Risk

House Republicans advanced a bill out of committee this week that could jeopardize the retirement security of thousands of Iowans and impose new restrictions on local governments.

House Study Bill 165 removes a local government’s ability to fund employee benefits and pensions from the Trust and Agency Fund. Instead, retirement payments would have to be funded out of other local government funding sources that would now be limited to a 2% annual increase. Requiring funding of these benefits would put this funding in competition with other city responsibilities, such as paying for police and fire fighters.

The bill also takes away decisions from local elected officials by placing arbitrary limits on local government spending. The bill prohibits a city or county government from increasing the budget by more than 2% annually. While it exempts taxes from new construction from the limit, there is no consideration in the bill for increasing values of property in a community. It also includes no considerations for new facilities or services a local government may provide other than requiring a special election.

The bill now goes to the full House for debate. It’s unclear if the Senate will consider this measure.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»A 2 percent solution to a...»Reply #1