Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4. I was present
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:21 PM
Sep 29

I was present at this trial. The police conducted very sloppy witness interviews and provided almost no other evidence on the man. They absolutely did not meet the burden of proof for a conviction.

The real question that should be asked is why the police did not collect what would have been common sense evidence from witnesses, call witnesses they were expected to call or adhere to best practices with their witness interviews.

No jury would have convicted this man in the evidence submitted.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

One step forward... five steps back. OldBaldy1701E Sep 28 #1
would sure like to know what the testimony stopdiggin Sep 28 #2
Why? catrose Sep 28 #3
I was present CuriousGeorge17 Sep 29 #4
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»District of Columbia»Jury acquits man on all c...»Reply #4