Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexLaProgressive

(12,344 posts)
1. The odd thing is, when cellular telephony was first proposed the idea was to have lots of "cells."
Mon Jul 12, 2021, 08:43 AM
Jul 2021

These mini transceivers and antennas would be mounted on utility poles, traffic lights and buildings. For some reason, the concept of cells morphed into mega sized cells requiring towers. Now this make sense in rural areas but not so much in urban. 5G is sort of going back to the smaller cell size, but it doesn't look like they are implementing it well. One thing to consider, is that cell phones were originally just that, telephones. The ubiquitous internet has required the simple audio device to become the smart phone.

I don't have any solutions for the people who get their knickers in a knot over towers. This isn't really new. I saw odd trees on top of hills in Connecticut, and some churches got a windfall by leasing the steeple and a room for equipment. The steeple would be replaced with one that looked identical but is transparent to radio frequencies. The antenna would be inside. The lease money was often more than enough to cover utilities and maintenance expensive of the church.

In any case, it sounds a lot like The Former Guy (Prima Donald) complaining about wind generators visable from his Scottish golf courses.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Delaware»The ugly side of 5G: New ...»Reply #1