Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Arizona

Pantagruel

(2,580 posts)

4. C'mon, the decision seems reasonable.

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Mon Dec 13, 2021, 06:34 PM

Dec 2021

"In 2018, for example, the most recent figures in court records, just 2,435 ballots statewide were rejected because they arrived in unsigned envelopes and the voters never made the trip to county election offices by 7 p.m. on Election Day to “cure” the problem.

If election officials find an envelope is missing a signature, they attempt to notify the voter of the problem – ballot envelopes have a space for a phone number – and tell them that it will not be counted. And they offer an option of fixing the problem with a replacement ballot, but only through 7 p.m. on Election Day. "

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court: Can't fix unsigned ballots after election [View all] TexasTowelie Dec 2021 OP

That is their game. Gerrymander, suppress and intimidate. onecaliberal Dec 2021 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2021 #2

Not sure if more Republicans than Democrats would forget to sign ballots, and yes, wouldn't be Alexander Of Assyria Dec 2021 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2021 #5

Raises hand... QED Dec 2021 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 2021 #7

C'mon, the decision seems reasonable. Pantagruel Dec 2021 #4