Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Musicians

Analog Peter

(6 posts)

13. Go with CV

Reply to VGNonly (Original post)

Wed Aug 10, 2022, 11:22 AM

Aug 2022

If you are going to get a Squier, go with the CV. I would recommend staying away from the Affinity. They just don't have good quality for even their price point. As with any guitar, you can get lucky and find a better than normal. If you do decide to go that route, make sure you can play it first. With the CV, I would feel comfortable ordering online.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Squier Telecasters [View all] VGNonly Apr 2022 OP

The CV are really nice for the price point Docreed2003 Apr 2022 #1

Anyone know if the Squire line includes a "Nashville Tele" style guitar? Zambero Apr 2022 #2

Several years ago there was a Squier SSH tele that was set up like a Nashville tele Docreed2003 Apr 2022 #4

I always look at reverb Duncanpup Apr 2022 #9

🤣... Docreed2003 Apr 2022 #11

The classic vibes are indeed cool for the price point. Eko Apr 2022 #3

I have very limited VGNonly Apr 2022 #5

You can't beat a tele for country Docreed2003 Apr 2022 #6

One more thing to stress Docreed2003 Apr 2022 #7

In my experience, the necks of "Crafted in China" Squiers with "CY" serial numbers can't be beat. Mister Ed Apr 2022 #8

You sir are correct Duncanpup Apr 2022 #10

Chiming In Late ProfessorGAC Apr 2022 #12

Go with CV Analog Peter Aug 2022 #13

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Musicians»Squier Telecasters»Reply #13