Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Showbiz

hlthe2b

(109,267 posts)

1. Yes. Yet Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about his inclusion or not. He should have been included IMO.

Reply to BigmanPigman (Original post)

Sun Mar 12, 2023, 11:20 PM

Mar 2023

Had he been convicted of his wife's murder, then absolutely not. But he was not and his 7 or more decades of work should have gotten at least the briefest of inclusion.

And, I say this thinking it is more likely than not that he may have been guilty, but agree with the verdict that it was not proven.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Oscars 2023 In Memoriam [View all] BigmanPigman Mar 2023 OP

Yes. Yet Jimmy Kimmel made a joke about his inclusion or not. He should have been included IMO. hlthe2b Mar 2023 #1

But he lost the civil suit. So I can understand why the Academy might have spooky3 Mar 2023 #2

I think they just didn't have time... hlthe2b Mar 2023 #3