Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. That works too, although, of course, as soon as you set something like that up
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 09:50 AM
Feb 2015

the banks will simply start 'selling' properties back and forth at minimal amounts to avoid losing them or paying any real taxes.

My own suggestion, a year or two back, on another forum, was that taxes assessed on unoccupied properties should grow the longer a property sits empty, which would have a similar effect over time, when the banks would get to the point where they might as well sell cheap, or simply lose it to back taxes. But I'm sure there's a way for the banks to 'work around' that as well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»We need to fight for soci...»Reply #5