Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socialist Progressives

(8,352 posts)

4. She doesn't.

Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:33 PM

Mar 2016

But it would be nice if she would state that she won't endorse either. Various organizations and figures have said the same without repercussions.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Where's Elizabeth Warren? [View all] CaptCaribbean Mar 2016 OP

She was most likely Awknid Mar 2016 #1

She doesn't. TM99 Mar 2016 #4

I would simply like her to stop being coy. TM99 Mar 2016 #3

Fair Enough! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #5

Why? Pharaoh Mar 2016 #7

As I said, she doesn't have to endorse either one. TM99 Mar 2016 #12

That would be her business as to why she is holding back Half-Century Man Mar 2016 #6

When the winner cinches the nom... Mike Nelson Mar 2016 #10

Obvious CaptCaribbean Mar 2016 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Pharaoh Mar 2016 #13

At least she stayed neutral. That's a lot more than most of them did. Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #14

This is sort of off-topic - Liz is a democrat TBF Mar 2016 #15