Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
10. I guess...
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

That I am a but pedantic about it, but only because if it means absolutely everything then it means absolutely nothing.

Plus I do think we have all sorts of good words we can use to spread clarity and avoid confusion.

And when I look at the right wing sites they genuinely think Sanders is trying to nationalize companies like Google and Apple, etc etc... Heck even some Hillary supporters push that sort of fear driven propaganda... So to the end of avoiding unnecessary hardship I'd prefer a more rigid definition, in a selfish way

It is a rainbow though and Polisci and a euro won't even get you a Lucozade.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bernie is not a socialist EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #1
I know what Bernie is and Wolff has Ichingcarpenter Feb 2016 #2
Why do you say ... Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #3
Socialism EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #4
On what basis ... Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #5
I don't at all EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #6
Edward you seem like a good fellow ... Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #7
Thank you EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #8
I am ... Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #9
I guess... EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #10
Dude! Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #11
interesting EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #13
Perhaps of some help. Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #12
I'll watch this :) EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #14
Watched "Pandora's Box" Powers Hapgood Feb 2016 #15
100% agreed EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #16
oh and EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»"WHY SOCIALISM IS BACK ON...»Reply #10