His run-through of her imbroglios, from Whitewater to that private e-mail server, is terse and straightforward the only time he seems really angry is when he charges the Clinton Foundation with bungling its rebuilding efforts in post-earthquake Haiti. (At the time, only Bill was at the helm of the foundation, but Henwood argues that Hillary, as secretary of state, urged investment in reconstruction projects that fell far short of what was needed.)
This bears little resemblance to what I wrote about the Clintons doings in Haiti, which were truly grotesque, and very much a joint project of the two of them. Their history with that country a country whose annual per-capita income is equal to about twelve seconds of her standard speaking fee goes back to their 1975 honeymoon there.
As secretary of state, she and her underlings enabled a deeply corrupt election, worked to suppress an increase in the minimum wage (of concern to women garment workers, something youd think feminists would care about), and seriously botched reconstruction after the 2010 earthquake. USAID, an agency under State Department supervision, built horrid housing and deployed toxic trailers to accommodate the displaced at the same time the embassy in Port-au-Prince commissioned snazzy housing for its staff.
I have read a bit on the Clinton/Haitian reconstruction theme in other venues. But, as the author points out, many uncritical supporters of HRC ignore her actual record and her actual history in favor of a romanticized version, a mythologized version wherein HRC is a liberal savior who will magically get things done in the face of GOP intransigence.