Envisioning Utopias [View all]
Wrights project is best understood as a form of neo-Tocquevillian Marxism. The basic elements of his critique of capitalism derive from Marx. But his image of socialism, as well as his political vision, is much more indebted to Tocqueville or Durkheim (although he discusses neither of these authors explicitly). This is clear both in his view of socialism as social empowerment rather than a mode of production, and in his preferred political strategy which relies not on class struggle, but on broad social cooperation.
We need to engage with and extend the revolutionary Marxist tradition not reject it. In this connection, its worth noting that How to Be an Anticapitalist Today distorts one of the central messages of this line of thought.
An Anticapitalism That Can Win
We should engage with and update the revolutionary Marxist tradition not reject it.
Dylan Riley 1-7-16
Todays left boasts many brilliant students of capitalism, the state, culture, and geopolitics. But its strategic thinking is woefully underdeveloped. There are two obvious explanations for this: the chasm between the injustices of global capitalism and the sorts of social agents that could potentially transform it, and skepticism about the project of a scientifically informed radical politics.
Whatever the reason, the Left still awaits a figure who could plausibly claim the mantle of Gramsci, the early Kautsky, Lenin, Luxemburg, or Trotsky. Erik Olin Wrights How to Be an Anticapitalist Today, which is a pithy summation of the main political message of his 2010 book Envisioning Real Utopias, focuses precisely on the questions of socialist strategy that were at the core of the revolutionary Marxist tradition. If only for this reason, his courageous and clearly stated position deserves close attention.
The specific problem of Envisioning and How to be an Anticapitalist Today is how to develop a radical politics in a context whereno existing social theory is sufficiently powerful to even begin to construct . . . a comprehensive representation of possible social destinations, possible futures. This theoretical failing creates a gap between the time-horizons of scientific theory and the time-horizons of transformative struggles. ...
Much more here:
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/01/olin-wright-real-utopias-socialism-capitalism-gramsci-lenin-luxemburg/
And the back-up article written by Erik Olin Wright:
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/12/erik-olin-wright-real-utopias-anticapitalism-democracy/