Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: 5 Reasons Why Shakespeare Should Not Be Required in Schools [View all]GreatGazoo
(4,635 posts)72. If you insist
Shakespeare wrote his plays in Elizabethan English, which uses different grammar and spelling than modern English language. In order to fully grasp Shakespeares words, students and teachers must dedicate a substantial amount of time and effort to deciphering his language and its context. Theres no reason teachers should waste valuable class time translating outdated dialects.
https://theblackandwhite.net/70984/opinion/to-teach-shakespeare-or-not-to-teach-shakespeare-that-is-the-question/
Everything we read and hear influences our sense of what is grammatical and therefore how we approach grammar:
Defenders of our antiquated grammar system sometimes claim that formal grammar instruction gradually builds a grand synthesis in our brains. Suddenly we grasp how the disparate elements of grammar work together to create meaning.
Theres some truth here: we need that grand synthesis in order to use English effectively. Im using it to write this article. But all of us built that grand synthesis ourselves in early childhood. By the time we entered first grade, most of us knew how to use the elements of grammar in an amazing variety of ways.
Harvard professor Steven Pinker explains that The complexity of language, from the scientists point of view, is part of our biological birthright; it is not something that parents teach their children or something that must be elaborated in school
Theres some truth here: we need that grand synthesis in order to use English effectively. Im using it to write this article. But all of us built that grand synthesis ourselves in early childhood. By the time we entered first grade, most of us knew how to use the elements of grammar in an amazing variety of ways.
Harvard professor Steven Pinker explains that The complexity of language, from the scientists point of view, is part of our biological birthright; it is not something that parents teach their children or something that must be elaborated in school
https://medium.com/@jeanreynolds40/the-case-of-the-missing-grammar-e1f326178630
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Shakespeare's themes are timeless. Unless this is an April Fool's prank, I find it ridiculous.
hlthe2b
Wednesday
#1
What total BS. Just like all but claiming the UK has no tanks but only royal horses
hlthe2b
Wednesday
#7
Once again, you have NOT read (or at least comprehended) my posts that do counter you.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#39
I note your earlier post is asserting UK has 501 royal horses & only 334 tanks. (eyeroll)
hlthe2b
Wednesday
#5
Nix on "Streetcar". Never understood why that piece of crap is considered art.
eppur_se_muova
Wednesday
#6
Exactly! Throw some deeply damaged, disturbed individuals together to see how, and how much, they can damage each other.
eppur_se_muova
Friday
#97
I think Williams' message was exactly that: the brutish, insensitive people exploit the sensitive, delicate ones.
CTyankee
38 min ago
#108
When I was in seventh grade, I read through all of the Shakespeare comedies. I loved them.
Walleye
Wednesday
#10
All the titles from 6, except the angry men were studied between jr high and high school
questionseverything
Friday
#78
I love the King James Version of the Bible. My father's Masonic Bible is a treasure I handed down to my son.
CTyankee
Thursday
#42
Love Shakespeare. Always have, since first reading his plays in 6th grade. Years ago, two
highplainsdem
Wednesday
#17
We can't know what the author intended because they were deceased when The Tempest
GreatGazoo
Friday
#63
This is bullshit. Maybe modern high school students could handle it just fine
Ocelot II
Thursday
#52
I've always loved Shakespeare. I took Shakespeare in my college English Dept. and acted in Twelfth Night...
wcmagumba
Thursday
#53
I will take Shakespeare any day over some of the other dreck we read in high school.
3catwoman3
Thursday
#54
I found many of the 19th century English novels in secondary school canon boring
Ilikepurple
Thursday
#57
One big problem with writing at that time is that writers were paid by length.
Coventina
Thursday
#58
When I learned that Dickens had been paid by the word, it explained a lot about why Great Expectations...
3catwoman3
16 hrs ago
#102
I had a hard time getting into A Tale of Two Cities and haven't revisited it as I have other 19th century novels.
Ilikepurple
Friday
#92
None of the plays you listed in number one would be here were it not for Shakespeare.
OldBaldy1701E
Thursday
#59