The DU Lounge

Last edited Wed Apr 1, 2026, 10:33 PM - Edit history (1)

historically accurate. Was not even referring to the history plays. I was referring to things like the language used and the customs portrayed, e. g. how personal feuds and grievances were avenged, belief in witchcraft (Macbeth) and ghosts (Hamlet).

Yes, I know that Shakespeare's plots were borrowed and rewritten from different times and places. I know that the historical plays had to conform to the Crown's views because Ellizabeth was a patron. But his ability to evoke emotion and to tell a story is good.

On grammar, Shakespeare was quite..um..."innovative" in his use of words, expressions, grammar, and in making up words. Consequently, his plays introduced meanings and expressions that have become commonplace and frequently quoted. His influence on the English language is tremendous.

I agree that Marlowe and Johnson were good, but believe that Shakespeare was better at portraying human nature and appealing across classes. But, I have to admit that I am more familiar with Shakespeare than with the other two.

I also love Shakespeare's sonnets. My favorite is "My mistress's eyes..." I don't remember the number of that sonnet. I love it for its humorous jabs at hyperbolic poets while conveying that sincerity of feeling is better than flowery fantasies.