Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgmiller

(696 posts)
14. He just wants to say he appointed to new justices
Thu Apr 16, 2026, 12:58 PM
18 hrs ago

If they do retire whoever he puts there will be just as bad as the two of them. He does not care that the replacements will serve for 30 years he just wants to be able to say he got to more, it's him keeping score.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do they need 60 votes in the Senate to confirm? Bluestocking 22 hrs ago #1
No JBTaurus83 22 hrs ago #2
51. If either Justice died after January 2026, no_hypocrisy 22 hrs ago #5
Epstein. marble falls 22 hrs ago #3
Democratic Senate Candidates displacedvermoter 22 hrs ago #4
It won't matter if he replaces them with Cannon and Barron Fiendish Thingy 22 hrs ago #6
A worse person than those two pwb 21 hrs ago #7
That was my reaction after seeing the headline Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 18 hrs ago #10
They found Kavanaugh. eggplant 18 hrs ago #11
he doesn't need worse, just younger Oliver Bolliver Butt 17 hrs ago #15
- Lemon Lyman 12 hrs ago #20
If ever there was a reason to change how SCOTUS is organized... TheWaywardTarheel 20 hrs ago #8
Ideal outcome... homegirl 19 hrs ago #9
I'd really like to share that article, but it's behind a paywall. Sogo 18 hrs ago #12
We need a super majority! BidenRocks 18 hrs ago #13
He just wants to say he appointed to new justices jgmiller 18 hrs ago #14
"Piggy couched his comments MorbidButterflyTat 16 hrs ago #16
I SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO look forward to having somebody else sounding off calimary 16 hrs ago #17
He may continue to sound off for a while, but I don't think he'll be able to do it for long. ShazzieB 15 hrs ago #19
No, jackhole, YOU won't "have somebody for 40 years." ShazzieB 16 hrs ago #18
Who would have thought what was at stake in 2000, 2016, and 2024 that it was the SUPREME COURT? lostincalifornia 11 hrs ago #21
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump leans in on a major...»Reply #14