Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

(18,801 posts)

7. No they didnt

Sun Dec 15, 2024, 03:07 PM

Dec 15

It was a bipartisan ruling that said states shouldn’t have the power to interpret the constitution for the nation, only federal courts or Congress.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship could be decided by the Supreme Court [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 15 OP

Well they made the constitution unconstitutional with immunity for fuckface Hassin Bin Sober Dec 15 #2

Marbury v Madison granted it creeksneakers2 Dec 15 #9

SCOTUS already invalidated 14A Sec 3. bucolic_frolic Dec 15 #3

And a well-regulated militia means an unregulated non-militia unblock Dec 15 #6

No they didnt Fiendish Thingy Dec 15 #7

But ... Igel Dec 15 #11

I am a grandson Henry203 Dec 15 #5

It would take incredibly cruelty creeksneakers2 Dec 15 #8

See Niemoeller. eppur_se_muova Dec 15 #10

The Gang of Six is bought and paid for Blue_Tires Dec 15 #12