Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,932 posts)
6. Iran may be claiming a grounding that actually happened in Iranian waters
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 12:35 PM
Wednesday
Iranian state media released a video and is reporting that a containership went aground because it was operating outside its designated shipping lane in the Strait of Hormuz. The IRGC, however, appears to be exploiting an incident involving a shadowy vessel that was operating on an Iranian coastal route.
...
The Iranian reports are not identifying the vessel, but one ship shows aground based on its AIS signal. The Arita (20,643 dwt), which was transmitting that it was traveling to Asseluysh, Iran. The vessel’s position is north of Hormuz Island and well north of the Iranian route near Lark Island.

Equasis lists the vessel as having been sold in 2025 to unknown owners and sailing under a false Comoros flag. The ship is 168 meters (551 feet) in length. Its last registered inspection was at the beginning of 2026 in Novorossisk, Russia. The images show the vessel riding high in the water with containers loaded on deck.

Despite Iran’s claim about the Strait of Hormuz, Kpler tracked a total of 34 verified crossings on June 30. It reports they were fragmented across Iran’s route, the Omani/IMO route, or some transited dark. It says there was a broad mix of types of vessels making the transit.

https://maritime-executive.com/article/iran-exploits-containership-grounding-to-assert-hormuz-control

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ship runs aground in Stra...»Reply #6